PENGARUH GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCETERHADAP AUDIT REPORT LAG DENGAN KETEPATAN WAKTU PENYAMPAIAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI

Authors

  • Bq. Anggun Hilendri Universitas Mataram
  • Bambang Bambang Universitas Mataram
  • Yana Yulia Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/jaa.v2i1.13

Keywords:

board of commissioners, independent commissioners, audit committee, public accountant firms, audit report lag, timeliness, financial statement submission.

Abstract

The demand for transparency is quite high since Indonesia is mired in the economic crisis. In fact, this situation is very understandable since a very good level of transparency ascertained the parties concerned regarding accountability of management. Transparency of the company's financial statement is reflected on the audit and the timeliness of financial reporting.

This study aims to examine the influence of good corporate governance on audit report lag with the timeliness of financial statement submission as a moderation variable. Independent variables used in this study are board of commissioners, independent commissioners, audit committees, and public accounting firms, with timeliness of financial statement submission as the moderating variable, and audit report lag as dependent variable. The population in his research is 100 companies listed in Kompas 100 stock index. Pursuant to purposive sampling technique, this study obtained 84 companies for oneyear observation, which is the year of 2015.

The result of the study indicate that board of commissioner have negative effect to audit report lag, while independent commissioner, audit committee, and the size of public accounting firm has no influence on audit report lag. The results also show that the timeliness of financial statement submission could not be the moderator on the relationship between board of commissioner, independent commissioner, audit committee and public, accountant firms with audit report lag.

References

Afify, H.A.E. 2009. Determinants of audit report lag: Does implementing corporate governance have any impact? Empirical evidence from Egypt. Journal of Applied Accounting Research. Vol. 10. No. 1, pp:56 86
Agoes, Sukrisno. 2012. Auditing: Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan Oleh Akuntan Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Didipu, Fajrin Abd. Rahman. 2016. Pengaruh Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik, Ukuran Perusahaan, Dan Kompleksitas Operasi Perusahaan Terhadap Audit Report Lag (Studi Empiris Di Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bei Tahun 2013-2015). Skripsi Universitas Hasanuddin.
Elkington, John. 1997. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone.
Fujianti, Lailah. 2016. Ketaatan Hukum Mampukah Memoderasi Hubungan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Audit Report Lag. Simposiun Nasional Akuntansi XIX. Lampung.
Grant, Robert M. 2007. Contemporary Strategy Analisys. Washington D.C. Blackwell Publishers.
Hashim, U.J.B., Rahman, R.B.A. 2011. Audit Report Lag and the Effectiveness of Audit Committee Among Malaysian Listed Companies. International Bulletin of Business Administration. No. 10, pp. 50-61
Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H. 1976.Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, October, 1976, V. 3, No. 4, pp. 305-360.
Keputusan direksi PT. Bursa Efek Jakarta Nomor 307/BEJ/07-2004
Kumara, Raditya Andika. 2015. Pengaruh Corporate Governance terhadap Audit Report Lag (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di BEI Tahun 2010-2013). Skripsi Universitas Dipenogoro.
Lawrence, Janice and Barry Bryan. 1998. Characteristics Associated with Audit Delay in The Monitoring of Low Income Housing Projects. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, V. 10, No. 2, pp. 173-191.
Mulyadi. 2002. Auditing (edisi 6). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Naimi, Mohamad. Mohamad-Nor, Rohami Shafie and Wan Nordin Wan- Hussin,2010. Corporate Governance and Audit Report Lag in Malaysia. Malaysia: Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance. Vol. 6, No. 2, 57-84
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2004. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 33 Tahun 2014 tentang Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris Emiten Atau Perusahaan Publik.
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 55 Tahun 2015 tentang Pembentukan dan Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kerja Komite Audit.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.Roadmap Tata Kelola Perusahaan Indonesia Menuju Tata Kelola Emiten dan Perusahaan Lebih Baik, Jakarta: OJK, 2014.
Shukeri, S.W., Nelson, S.P. 2011. Corporate Governance and Audit Report Timeliness: Evidence from Malaysia, Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, No. 11: 109-127.
Standar Akuntansi Keuangan: Per Efektif 1 Januari 2015, 2015. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia, Salemba Empat.
Sulistyo, Wahyu Adhy N. 2010. Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Ketepatan Waktu Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan yang Listing di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2006- 2008. Skripsi Universitas Diponegoro.
Sumartini dan Widhiyani. 2014. Pengaruh Opini Audit, Solvabilitas, Ukuran KAP dan Laba Rugi Pada Audit Report Lag. Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana. Vol 9 No. 1.
Bank Indonesia.2013. Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No. 15/15/DPNP Prihal Pelaksanaan Good Corporate Governance Bagi Bank Umum.
Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2011 tentang Akuntan Publik

Wardhani, Armania Putri. 2013. Pengaruh Corporate Governance terhadap Audit Report La. Skripsi Universitas Dipenogoro.
Widya, Maria Graffeliesta. 2013. Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit Terhadap Audit Report Lag (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Non-Financial Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Skripsi Universitas Dipenogoro.
Wijaya, Aditya Taruna. 2012. Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit Terhadap Audit Report Lag (Kajian Empiris Pada Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2010). Skripsi Universitas Dipenogoro.
Wikipedia. 2014. Indeks Kompas 100. https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indeks_Kompas100, diakses pada tanggal 22 Maret 2017. www.idx.co.id. Diakses pada tanggal 15 Januari 2017.
Zattoni, A. and Cuomo, F. 2010. How independent, competent and incentivized should non-executive directors be? An empirical examination of good corporate codes. British Journal of Management 21 (1): 63-79.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-12

How to Cite

Hilendri, B. A., Bambang, B., & Yulia, Y. (2018). PENGARUH GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCETERHADAP AUDIT REPORT LAG DENGAN KETEPATAN WAKTU PENYAMPAIAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI. Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 2(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.29303/jaa.v2i1.13