THE INFLUENCE OF POLITICAL CONNECTIONS ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE IN INDONESIA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/jaa.v10i2.722

Keywords:

Political Connections, Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR Disclosure

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the link between CSR disclosure and politically connected companies. A quantitative approach utilizing multiple linear regression analysis in Stata version 17 was used to analyze the association between independent and dependent variables in all corporations registered on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2019 to 2023, leaving out the financial and banking sectors, resulting in 1,105 companies. This study found that the availability of political connections encourages increased CSR disclosure to strengthen relationships with stakeholders and build a positive image in the eyes of the public for the benefit of the business. This study is interesting because it focuses on a single period of the latest government regime in Indonesia as a developing country, thus enabling more consistent results that are free from potential policy bias due to leadership changes.

References

Ananzeh, H., Al Shbail, M. O., Al Amosh, H., Khatib, S. F. A., & Abualoush, S. H. (2023). Political connection, ownership concentration, and corporate social responsibility disclosure quality (CSRD): empirical evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 20(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-022-00167-z

Chen, Y. C., Hung, M., & Wang, Y. (2018). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(1), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.11.009

CNN Indonesia. (2024). Fakta-fakta Kasus Dugaan Korupsi Dana CSR Bank Indonesia. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20241229125351-12-1181958/fakta-fakta-kasus-dugaan-korupsi-dana-csr-bank-indonesia

Dang, V. Q. T., Otchere, I., & So, E. P. K. (2022). Does the nature of political connection matter for corporate social responsibility engagement? Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 52(February), 100907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2022.100907

de Andres, P., Garcia-Rodriguez, I., Romero-Merino, M. E., & Santamaria-Mariscal, M. (2023). Political directors and corporate social responsibility: Are political ideology and regional identity relevant? In Review of Managerial Science (Vol. 17, Issue 1). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00526-8

Deegan, C. (2007). Organizational legitimacy as a motive for sustainability reporting. In Sustainability Accounting and Accountability. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203815281

Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Pacific Sociological Association Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. Source: The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.

Faccio, M. (2010). Differences between Politically Connected and Nonconnected Firms: A Cross-Country Analysis. Financial Management, 39(3), 905–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01099.x

Ganguly, K., & Mishra, A. K. (2023). Does Investment in CSR Activities Enhance Firm Value for Politically Connected Firms? Evidence from India. Global Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509231157513

Harymawan, I., Nasih, M., Madyan, M., & Sucahyati, D. (2019). The role of political connections on family firms' performance: evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Financial Studies, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs7040055

ICI. (2016). ISO 26000 sebagai Standar Global dalam Pelaksanaan CSR. Iso Center Indonesia. https://isoindonesiacenter.com/sekilas-tentang-iso-26000/

IDX. (2025). Perkuat Transparansi Data ESG, BEI Luncurkan ESG Reporting Untuk Perusahaan Tercatat. https://www.idx.co.id/id/berita/siaran-pers/2306

Ioannou, L., & Serafeim, G. (2019). The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, 452–489. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198802280.013.20

Joni, J., Ahmed, K., & Hamilton, J. (2020). Politically connected boards, family and business group affiliations, and cost of capital: Evidence from Indonesia. The British Accounting Review, 52(3), 100878. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100878

Li, Q., & Guo, M. (2022). Do the resignations of politically connected independent directors affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 73(74), 102174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102174

Lind, D. A., Marchal, W. G., & Wathen, S. A. (2014). Teknik-Teknik Statistika dalam Bisnis dan Ekonomi (Delapan Be). Salemba Empat.

Loh, L., Thao, N. T. P., Sim, I., Thomas, T., & Yu, W. (2016). Sustanability Reporting in ASEAN: State of Progress in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand 2015. ASEAN CSR Network, October, 1–28. https://asean.org/book/sustainability-reporting-in-asean-state-of-progress-in-indonesia-malaysia-singapore-and-thailand-2015/

Ludya, A., & Dewi, S. (2024). The Role of Female Directors and CSR Committees on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.24843/JIAB.2024.v19.i01.p04

Mardiana, F., Suprayoga, S., & Pratiwi, L. I. (2024). Koneksi Politik dan Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility: Tinjauan Literatur dari Berbagai Negara. Owner, 8(2), 1073–1084. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v8i2.2131

Moratis, L. (2016). Out of the ordinary? Appraising ISO 26000' s CSR definition. International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 58 No, 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-12-2014-0064

Park, S. H. (2022). Political connection and CSR: Evidence from Korea. Business Ethics, Environment and Responsibility, 31(4), 1102–1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12452

PwC. (2023). laporan Asia Pacific Sustainability Counts II.

Selin, M., Joni, J., & Ahmed, K. (2023). Political affiliation types and corporate social responsibility (CSR) commitment: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 19(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-08-2021-0109

Sucahyati, D., Harymawan, I., & Nasih, M. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure on Politically Connected-Family Firms. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 23(2), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v23i2.14865

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.108.2768&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Surono, & Mayangsari, S. (2022). Pengaruh Koneksi Politik, Kepemilikan Keluarga Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 9(1), 1–26. https://scholar.archive.org/work/6qsf7xujpfbgxajsvn3trkhcsa/access/wayback/https://www.trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/jat/article/download/10357/pdf

Tee, K., Chen, X. H., & Hooy, C. W. (2024). The evolution of corporate social responsibility in China: Do political connection and ownership matter? Global Finance Journal, 60(February), 100941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100941

Zhou, H., He, F., & Wang, Y. (2017). Did family firms perform better during the financial crisis? New insights from the S&P 500 firms. Global Finance Journal, 33, 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.01.001

Downloads

Published

2026-01-12

How to Cite

Kurnikova, A. A., & Sucahyati, D. (2026). THE INFLUENCE OF POLITICAL CONNECTIONS ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE IN INDONESIA. Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 10(2), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.29303/jaa.v10i2.722